Welker Joins 4k/4k/2k Club

With a 9-yard punt return in the first quarter of Sunday’s game, Wes Welker reached a milestone that is a testament to his versatility. The return pushed Welker’s career yardage on punt returns to 2004. After three straight seasons floating near the top of the receptions and receiving yardage lists, Welker has more than 4500 receiving yards in his career. Although he does not do much in the way of kick returns any longer, three seasons as an excellent kickoff return man in Miami have moved his kickoff return yardage over 4000 as well.

Welker joins Eric Metcalf (3453 punt return yards, 5813 kickoff return yards, and 5572 receiving yards) as the only two players in NFL history to record a minimum of 4000 yards receiving and on kickoff returns plus 2000 or more on punt returns. Welker may not be the most versatile player in NFL history, as guys like Metcalf (2392 career rushing yards) and Brian Mitchell also contributed in the running game. He may, however, be one of the most dominant WRs to contribute at similarly elite levels in both the kick and punt return game (Tim Brown certainly could have, but after taking the league by storm as a kickoff returner in his rookie season, Brown would have only eight more kickoff returns in his career).

Quinn and Anderson, by the Numbers

QUINN AND ANDERSON, BY THE NUMBERS

The following are the preseason data for Brady Quinn and Derek Anderson, who are competing for the starting QB spot for the Cleveland Browns.

DRIVE SUMMARIES Anderson has led 9 drives, consisting of 45 plays, covering 262 yards, and accounting for 16 points. His drives have averaged 5.8 yards per play. Quinn has also led 10 drives, consisting of 58 plays, covering 305 yards, and accounting for 13 points. His drives have averaged 5.3 yards per play. The commonsense view on the two QBs is that Anderson is a big play guy who will make plays with higher risk and higher reward. This has amounted to shorter drives (4.5 plays, 29.1 yards per drive), but a slightly higher average per play. Quinn’s West Coast attack has led to slightly longer drives (5.8 plays per drive, 30.5 yards per drive), and slightly fewer yards per play (5.3). The only difference in points is a missed field goal at the end of a Quinn drive.

BAD DRIVES Anderson led a 3-and-out and a two-play drive resulting in an interception in the first preseason game. He played well in game 2, including just one three-play drive where he failed to secure a first down as well as a four-play drive that netted just 11 yards (and ended in an INT). Quinn’s first drive in game 2 was one play, a third down on which he was sacked. His third drive was an 8-play drive, but covered just 16 yards and ended in a punt. In game three, Quinn’s first drive was a 3-and-out.

FORTUITOUS DRIVES Anderson led three scoring drives in game 2. One of them covered just 5 yards on 3 plays and resulted in a field goal. Quinn’s TD drive was just two plays and 34 yards thanks to a fumble on the kickoff return.

GOOD DRIVES Call any drive that covers at least 40 yards, spans 7 plays or more, and does not end in a TO a “good drive.” Quinn has led three good drives, in addition to his TD drive. Anderson has led two, in addition to a 56-yard drive that resulted in a FG.

UNDER CENTER Both QBs have had at least one good game and at least one questionable game. Anderson’s best game was his start, where he hit on 8 of 13 passes, covered 130 yards, and was not sacked. Quinn’s start in game three was the best either QB has had. He hit on 11 of 15 passes for 128 yards, tossed a TD, and did not turn the ball over. Anderson’s poor outing was a very brief one. He threw two passes, one of which was an INT and neither of which were completed. Quinn’s bad game came in limited time as well, but there he hit on 3 of 5 passes for 29 yards (although he lost 7 yards on a sack).

ACCURACY Anderson hit on at least 60% of his passes in two games and sits at 57.7% (15/26) through three games. His best numbers were 7 for 11 (63.6%) in game three. Quinn has hit on at least 60% of his passes in each of the three games, including 11 for 15 (73.3%) in game three. His completion percent is currently 67.7% (21/31).

YARDAGE Anderson has thrown for 207 yards on 26 attempts, including 130 on 13 attempts in game 2. He has averaged 8 yards per attempt and 13.8 per completion. Quinn has thrown for 225 yards on 31 attempts, including 128 on 15 attempts in game 3. He has averaged 7.3 yards per attempt and 10.7 per completion.

TDs to INTs Quinn and Anderson have combined for three INTs in 57 pass attempts, an INT% of 5.3, which is poor. Anderon is responsible for 2 in 26 attempts (7.7 INTs per 100 passes), while Quinn has 1 in 31 attempts (3.2 INTs per 100 passes). While Anderson has not yet hit on a TD pass, Quinn has a TD ratio identical to his INT ratio. Overall, the QBs have a TD ratio of just 1.7 per 100, which is terrible.

PASSER RATING Anderson’s rating sits at 51.3, while Quinn’s is 86.1. Anderson has been slightly uneven from game to game, thanks in large part to his 0.0 rating in the first game in limited time. He followed that up with a 63 and an 84. Of those, only the third game is a respectable number. Quinn opened the season with a 43, a very poor number, but bounced back to record a slightly subpar 76.3 and finish game three with a rating of 121.0.

OAKLAND RAIDERS PREVIEW 2K8

Overview

In the six years since John Gruden turned the Raiders into a force to be reckoned with, piloting them to 38 wins and four playoff games in four seasons, Oakland fans have grown accustomed to heartache. When first year coach Bill Callahan led the Raiders to an 11-5 record, few doubted that it was Gruden’s lingering effects that guided the Raiders to the Super Bowl only to be annihilated by a grinning Gruden and his Buccaneers. In the past five seasons, the Raiders have never won more than 5 games and have gone 19-61 (.238). There have been no playoff appearances. There have been no meaningful games late in the season (at least none that had implications for the Raiders’ success; Oakland has not minded playing spoiler). Lane Kiffin is the fourth coach in the post-Gruden era, but it seems as if he is here for a lengthy stay. While his offensive schemes have not had ideal personnel, there is something to be said for Oakland’s running game and pass defense. This season should mark a return to respectability for the Raiders, but the path there is fraught with dangers and hardships.

The Record

Oakland probably does not have the most difficult schedule in the NFL, but they have no simple task ahead of them. They begin the season on a Monday night against Denver then head off to play two straight games on the road. A 0-3 record is something Raiders fans must hold as a possibility. Another brutal stretch toward season’s end sees Oakland facing Miami on the road before taking on Denver, Kansas City, and San Diego. After those three division games, New England comes to town. Oakland finishes up against Houston (at home) and Tampa Bay (on the road). What poetic justice it would be for Oakland to end the season on a high note, knock Tampa Bay out of playoff contention, and build on that win in the subsequent season.

Delivering prognostications about teams that have not played a regular season game is difficult. That much must be conceded. Yet it is possible to split games into three categories. Should-win Games see the Raiders with a high chance of victory (say 2/3 or more). Should-lose Games see the Raiders with a low chance of victory (say 1/3 or less). Toss-up Games are those that remain.

Should-win Games: Unfortunately, the Raiders are hardly in a position to claim any games as should-win. Statistically, they are not strong enough. The closest thing is a Week 9 matchup against Atlanta. Wins: 0.

Toss-up Games: Game 6 (Jets), Game 8 (Atlanta), Game 9 (Carolina), Game 12 (Kansas City), and Game 15 (Houston). Wins: 2.5.

Should-lose Games: All the rest, giving Oakland 11 games they really should be expected to lose. Statistically speaking, it would be incredibly unlikely that Oakland would lose all these games, so assume they win 25% to 33% of these games. Wins: 2.8-3.7.

Overall: Oakland will likely finish 5-11 or 6-10. While that is not good enough for a playoff spot (obviously) it would either tie (at 5 wins) the best post-Gruden record or would establish a new mark (6 wins). As noted, suffering is necessary on the path to respectability.

POSITIONAL BREAKDOWN

The Running Backs

Oakland can run the ball. They could run last year and they added probably their most dynamic runner in Darren McFadden, returned their best runner from last year (Justin Fargas), cut some dead weight (former fantasy standout LaMont Jordan), cut an intriguing player (Dominic Rhodes), and returned a player from the PUP list (Michael Bush). The three-headed attack of Fargas, DMC, and Bush will likely improve upon the 6th-best 130 yards per game from last season. Added to the mix is Justin Griffith whose benefits are primarily blocking and receiving, but he (and to a slight degree JaMarcus Russell) can run. Speaking of receptions out of the backfield, Fargas (23 reception in ’07 in addition to his 1009 yards on the ground), McFadden (4 grabs during preseason), and Bush (2 receptions during preseason and was a successful receiver at Louisville) can all catch the ball out of the backfield.

Projections: Determining how things will be split up is a difficult task. It seems evident that Fargas will receive the bulk of the carries early in the season. This will probably shift during the season as each back carves out a niche either breaking down by series (as Marcus Allen and Bo Jackson did) or by roles (Fargas as the starter, DMC as the 3rd down and 2-minute back, and Bush as the short distance and goalline runner).

Fargas: 892 rushing yards, 22 receptions, 156 receiving yards, 3.7 total TDs

McFadden: 864 rushing yards, 27 receptions, 208 receiving yards, 5.4 total TDs

Bush: 272 rushing yards, 10 receptions, 110 receiving yards, 2.9 total TDs

The Quarterback

JaMarcus Russell begins his first season at the helm. Everything about this guy is huge: his height, his weight, and his arm. He is not afraid to go deep and Al Davis loves that. Unfortunately, he has two difficult impediments to becoming say the next Kenny Stabler (alright, Jeff George): Lane Kiffin and arguably the worst receiving corps in the NFL. While Kiffin will go to bat for Russell, and has numerous times, he is hesitant to remove the training wheels. Part of the problem is poor offensive line protection. Another part may be an overprotectiveness that occurs sometimes when a young Quarterback is involved. While this route is probably better for a QB’s development over the course of his career, in the short term, expect a boring passing game. The Raiders’ success this season will be heavily dependent upon Russell’s play. His ability to play mistake free football will translate quickly to wins, but given his inexperience, he will struggle.

Russell: 241 completions, 426 attempts, 2494 yards, 14 TDs, 17 INTs

The Receivers

Oakland’s receivers might do well in sprints or bodybuilding competitions, but they are not going to win much else. Including games. The Raiders have not had an effective passing game since Rich Gannon left town. That is a fact that figures to remain until the team adds a top flight receiver. The brightest spot on the team is probably second year Tight End Zach Miller, who looks to build upon a very promising rookie season, but look for Ronald Curry to impress as long as his body holds up. Javon Walker is enigmatic, but could find success as the WR2. Ashley Lelie has not been effective since 2005 and just not joined the team, so gauging his impact is incredibly difficult. Johnny Lee Higgins and a few others should figure into the mix.

Curry: 48 receptions, 613 yards, 3 TDs

Walker: 45 receptions, 594 yards, 3 TDs

Miller: 44 receptions, 453 yards, 4 TDs

Lelie: 11 receptions, 145 yards, 0.3 TDs

The Line

The offensive line is a Jekyll and Hide story. Run blocking has been dominant at times during the preseason and seldom short of good. Even last season they opened sizable holes for multiple runners, allowing Jordan to post 159 and 121 yards rushing in Weeks 2 and 3; Fargas posted 179 in Week 4, 104 in Week 9, and 139 and 146 respectively in Weeks 12 and 13; and Dominic Rhodes closed the season with 115 and 122 yards on the ground. That is eight games of 100+ yards for one back including six games of 120+ for one back. Long runs were hardly scarce during the preseason, too. Oakland will run often and well.

When Oakland is forced to pass, however, problems arise. Last season, Oakland QBs were sacked 41 times for losses in excess of 250 yards, there were 23 fumbles by QBs, and 8 of those were lost. The pressure led to 20 interceptions on fewer than 450 pass attempts. During the preseason, Oakland’s starting QBs were sacked 8 times compared to 64 pass attempts, or once per nine dropbacks. The protection must improve if Russell is to have time to read defenses.

Defense

Oakland’s defense can be split into three distinct groups. The defensive backs are arguably the best in the game with Nnamdi Asomugha and DeAngelo Hall manning the Corners, Gibril Wilson and Michael Huff holding down the Safety positions. The foursome combined for 41 pass defenses and 11 interceptions last season. Asomugha grabbed 8 INTs the previous season, but was so good in coverage his assignment was seldom targeted last season.

The defensive line has shown itself to be porous against the run, but is able to put pressure on opposing QBs. Derrick Burgess has averaged double figure sacks since joining Oakland. Look for second year DE Jay Richardson, manning the other DE spot, to get in on the action.

The Raider Linebackers all return from last year, led by Kirk Morrison (121 tackles, 4 INTs last season) and Thomas Howard (96 tackles, 6 INTs). Robert Thomas had 62 tackles and forced two fumbles, but was a recent casualty. Ricky Brown, who recorded 13 tackles last season, will be the Sam LB in his place.

Oakland had the second worst rushing defense in the NFL last year, but was one of the better pass defensive teams. With little done to shore up the run except returning a good number of starter and hoping the unit gels, look for more of the same this season.

Special Teams

Shane Lechler and Sebastian Janikowski have both dealt with injuries, missing time during preseason. They should both be ready to go and will continue to give much of the same they have given their whole careers. Janikowski hit just 1 of his first 5 FGs last season before settling down to hit 21 of 27. That may not sound impressive, but bear in mind the fact that he kicked more than twice as many 50+ yard field goals (hitting 5 of 11) than anyone except Neil Rackers (who hit just 3 of 9). His leg strength was abused because of an atrocious ability to move the ball.

There is probably no better punter in the game now or ever than Shane Lechler. His 49.1 yard per punt average was absolutely ridiculous and increased his career average to 46.5. His Inside 20 to Touchback ratio improved from .551 to .625 after posting a career best 11 to 7. If he can continue to improve, there would be little argument left to be made for a better punter. Remaining as good as he has been should seal the deal.

In terms of the return game, gone is Oakland’s top kick returner (David Carr). Meanwhile Johnny Lee Higgins’s unimpressive debut as a punt returner may not disqualify him from the job this season. Higgins was very good on kickoff returns during preseason, totaling 162 yards on 5 returns (32.4 average) and returning one 58 yards. He also vacillated between greatness (a 53-yard TD) and garbage (3 returns for negative 3 yards in a game) on punts. His overall numbers were solid (6 for 67, 11.2 per return).

Travis J. Rodgers

travisjrodgers at GMAIL

https://rodgersreport.wordpress.com